@miguelgallardo Dr. (PhD) Miguel Gallardo PERITO Tel. (+34) 902998352 E-mail: [email protected]
@APEDANICA Asociación APEDANICA registered with the Ministry of the Interior www.cita.es/apedanica.pdf
Territorial Directorate – Provincial Labor and Social Security Inspectorate of Madrid (ITSS) [email protected] Attn. Javier Cerrolaza Aragón E/28-024267/21
Cc: Minister Yolanda Díaz Pérez, Secretary of State Joaquín Pérez Rey, Carmen Collado Rosique, Francisco Rogero Ortega, and Silvia Parra Núñez in ITSS Valencia
Document published at www.miguelgallardo.es/itss-posible-error.pdf
https://cita.es/itss-posible-error-justificante.pdf https://www.cita.es/itss-posible-error
We have received a postal letter with reference E/28-024267/21 regarding the documentation submitted about the company LEGAL ERASER SL, stating that “the same has been forwarded to the PROVINCIAL INSPECTION OF LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY OF ALMERÍA.” This is likely an error since LEGAL ERASER SL and the web of companies run by the accused administrator Jesús Campos Giner (at least those such as CDC NEPHRO DEVICES SL, GRANATUM AGRICOLA SL, ACCUAPLUS SOLUCIONES AVANZADAS PARA EL AGUA SL, FITOAGUA SL, and FITO RIEGO SL) are based in Valencia and NOT in ALMERÍA. Furthermore, it is associated with the Head of the ITSS team in the Balearic Islands, Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, convicted of two corruption crimes, who lives in Gavá (Barcelona) and is a client of Legal Eraser SL. Who authorized this odd “course” to the ITSS of Almería?
It has come to our attention through the Court (see report submitted by Concepción Sánchez Palomo) that according to ITSS, Legal Eraser SL has only one employee, as published in
https://cita.es/legal-eraser-inspeccionada.pdf, and this company with just one employee claims to have achieved over 450,000 links removed or censored from the internet, as they proudly boast in
preserved at https://cita.es/teborramos-valencia-plaza.pdf in an unimaginable censorship business in all of Europe or America, which has a highly questionable collaboration with Google (Google LLC, Google Spain, or Alphabet and the advertising network associated with LEGAL ERASER SL). The facts reported are extremely serious, and we cannot allow any errors or undue delays, considering the documentation already existing in ITSS and in the Court, as seen in this 14-page PDF including this first one, for which we request prompt acknowledgment of receipt and the rights under Art. 53 a) and b) of the current LPA, identifying all responsible officials.
Court of First Instance and Instruction No. 4 of Gavà Civil Section.
Ordinary procedure 119/2020 -1
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ÁNGEL MONTERO DE ESPINOSA SOLBES
Procurador/a: M. Lluïsa Valero Hernández Lawyer: FERNANDO MARÍA CHAPA SANCHO
Document published at www.miguelgallardo.es/inspector-ilocalizable-juzgado.pdf
Karina Barriga Bahamonde, procurator of the Courts and of Miguel Ángel Gallardo Ortiz (the defendant), under the legal direction of José Manuel López Iglesias, considering the Management Diligence of October 1, 2021, states as follows:
1. It is extremely severe that the Court has failed to cite the proposed witness (apparently, in a hostile manner) the Labor and Social Security inspector José Manuel Mora Lara with the data already on file that he himself signed and that was provided by this party with our evidence note for the Preliminary Hearing.
2. My client, the defendant here, has contacted the Ministry and the STATE ORGANIZATION LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY INSPECTION ITSS to report the previous fact.
Therefore, it is REQUESTED that, as soon as possible, the witness (public official) be summoned again with all this information:
JOSÉ MANUEL MORA LARA
LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY INSPECTOR at ITSS
O.A. STATE ORGANIZATION LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY INSPECTION
PROVINCIAL INSPECTION OF LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY OF VALENCIA
C/ URUGUAY Nº 13 46007 VALENCIA
TEL.: 96 316 8200 FAX: 96 316 82 22 E-mail: [email protected]
OTHERLY state: that if he cannot be summoned upon the second attempt, a notice should be sent to Judicial Police to effectively summon the witness and for the Prosecutor’s Office to act, IURA NOVIT CURIA.
For the better information of the Court, I attach below the document that my client has electronically registered to have all manifestations in this 13-page PDF on the date of digital signature.
@miguelgallardo Dr. (PhD) Miguel Gallardo PERITO Tel. (+34) 902998352 E-mail: [email protected]
@APEDANICA Asociación APEDANICA registered with the Ministry of the Interior www.cita.es/apedanica.pdf
To whom it may concern in the Inspection of the Ministry of Labor and Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations
Attn. Minister Yolanda Díaz Pérez, Secretary of State Joaquín Pérez Rey, Carmen Collado Rosique, Francisco Rogero Ortega and Silvia Parra Núñez in ITSS Valencia
Complaint and grievance published at www.cita.es/inspector-trabajo-ilocalizable.pdf
The Court of 1st Instance and Instruction 4 of Gavà (Barcelona) has not been able to notify a citation for inspector José Manuel Mora Lara whom we proposed per our evidence note in Preliminary Hearing published at https://cita.es/gava/nota.pdf with the following information:
T5 JOSÉ MANUEL MORA LARA, inspector in O.A. STATE ORGANIZATION LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY INSPECTION, PROVINCIAL INSPECTION OF LABOR AND SOCIAL SECURITY OF VALENCIA, with the notification address at C/URUGUAY Nª 13 46007 VALENCIA TEL.: 96 316 8200 FAX: 963168222 to inform about O.S. 46/0012400/21 and any relevant information pertaining to the plaintiff and his relation to all companies connected with the proposed witness as T3.
that were taken from the letter that we also published in
https://cita.es/legal-eraser-ss.pdf
The Court’s management order communicates to us as follows:
“Considering the negative result of the notification to witness José Manuel Mora Lara, practiced at the designated address in the proceedings, in accordance with the provisions of Art. 156 of the Civil Procedure Law (LEC), I request the party who proposed the testimony of José Manuel Mora Lara to indicate within TEN days whether they know any other possible addresses where the diligence can be carried.” It is extremely serious and prejudicial that the Court cannot summon an inspector from the State Organization for Labor and Social Security ITSS, especially when the plaintiff is another chief inspector from the Labor and Social Security Inspection team in the Balearic Islands with residence in Gavá (Barcelona), Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, who was convicted of negotiation and prohibited activities to officials and continued bribery. If the inspector cannot be located and summoned, we will not hesitate to exercise all civil, criminal actions and claims for patrimonial responsibility with the utmost publicity available to us due to our founded suspicions of collusion among inspecting officials with companies, especially those now related to Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes in Valencia and a witness also summoned by the same Court.
Even more concerning is that with a Valencia-based company, inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes presents a complaint for 7 offenses that the inspector claims to be unaware of in the recording of his call, which we have published and can be heard at
www.miguelgallardo.es/funcionario-calumniador-querellante.mp4
Note that inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes boasts of being a “PUBLIC AUTHORITY” and of speaking with the Minister of Labor and her cabinet, while also ignoring the complaint, whose firm archiving order with his name as complainant alongside that of the company he uses to censor online is published at
www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-archivada-querella-mendaz.pdf
The complaint by inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes includes accusations of 7 crimes AGAINST HONOR, FALSE ACCUSATION AND COMPLAINT AND SIMULATION OF CRIMES, REGARDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, DISCOVERY AND REVELATION OF SECRETS, and PROCESSUAL FRAUD, which are not only false but also malicious and injurious.
Moreover, in addition to filing a complaint that he claims to disregard, he has also filed a lawsuit for his honor against Google, expanded later against the individuals we proposed as witnesses to inspector José Manuel Mora Lara, whom the Court has failed to locate. It is also suspicious that, in the Preliminary Hearing held on 13.9.21, his lawyer informed Your Honor that the resolution being appealed was already notified, precisely at the most opportune procedural moment for the plaintiff official, suspiciously. It is quite coincidental that after more than one year and one month, the resolution reaches the lawyer of inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, just while the court hearing is being held. Both the timing and manner of this occurrence are suspicious, and therefore we have decided to publish this public hearing on YouTube where only professionals and officials participate, but no individuals, at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coZgNN9qwPM
and the second recording from the same Court at
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvaRbIrjB8w&t=0s
Just at the beginning of that recording, the lawyer for inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, in an extremely suspicious manner, brings to the judge’s attention the resolution that was not notified to us until after and we have been falsely accused of lying in court. What occurred with such timely notification is another rational indication of suspected collusion on which we reserve actions, but in any case, inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes (recall he was definitively convicted for “prohibited negotiation” and “continued bribery”) is already benefiting from censorship without judicial supervision for severely harmed individuals, with a trial pending in which the condemned inspector has already provided a censoring administrative resolution and withdrawal regarding Google, while we reserve all rights and actions in this regard.
All activities conducted by inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes related to LEGAL ERASER SL and its sole administrator JESÚS CAMPOS GINER, who is also legally responsible, at least for CDC NEPHRO DEVICES SL, GRANATUM AGRICOLA SL, ACCUAPLUS SOLUCIONES AVANZADAS PARA EL AGUA SL, FITOAGUA SL, FITO RIEGO SL, and generally, for anything that may assist those who have filed complaints against him are highly suspicious, beyond whatever documentation ITSS may provide for O.S. 46/0012400/21 that the Court has also required.
For example, the Superior Court of Justice of the Community of Valencia STSJ CV 986/2021 in which lawyer Sara Pastor Sansteban appears as defender of the company DIOSPYROS AGRÍCOLA, SL of which Cristina Campos Giner is the sole administrator and her lawyer Javier Franch Fleta, both complainants alongside inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes. This significant ruling dismisses the appeal of the one issued by the SOCIAL COURT No. 6 OF VALENCIA, in the proceedings 000546/2019, being appealed by UMIVALE COLLABORATIVE MUTUAL WITH SOCIAL SECURITY No. 15, represented by Lawyer Don Juan Manuel Romero Colomer, and also the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SECURITY can be fully viewed at www.cita.es/sentencia/sara-pastor-sanesteban-diospyros.pdf
In summary, inspector of Labor and Social Security Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, convicted for negotiation and prohibited activities to public officials and continued bribery, who is stationed in the Balearic Islands and resides in Gavá (Barcelona), is so confident in the lawyers of Legal Eraser (although they seem more like false self-employed workers rather than employees as they falsely state in writing and in court) that they can file a complaint in his name without his explicit approval.
Whoever accuses someone in Valencia of 7 offenses in a complaint they haven’t even read, according to their own declarations, resides in Gavá (Barcelona) and holds a position in Palma de Mallorca, may also unduly delegate their functions, or give powers to others acting on their behalf with the same lack of responsibility in the Inspection of the Balearic Islands, but in any case, what they say and how they say it is inadmissible, especially when he called the person denouncing here and also insulted them. It is worth enduring the insults of a convicted official for corruption so that everyone who wishes can hear him boasting of being a PUBLIC AUTHORITY and of his communication with the minister.
A separate chapter deserves the scandalous favorable treatment received by Labor and Social Security inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes from the search engine Google that has censored all news or mention regarding his conviction for negotiations and prohibited activities and continued bribery. We wonder why Google has pleased him and who else is complicit.
All the above evidence shows that Labor and Social Security inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes abuses his public employee status to obtain undue benefits for himself and others, which is classified as a very serious offense under Article 95, section J of the Basic Statute of Public Employees, and must be sanctioned.
For the reasons stated, it is REQUESTED that this expansion of the complaint with the attached documentation concerning O.S. 46/0012400/21 of ITSS be presented, and that inspectors José Manuel Mora Lara (NOT LOCATED BY THE COURT WHO SUMMONS HIM AS A WITNESS) be provided both to the Court and the present complaint his contact details and that the complaint hereby attached be expanded recognizing us as legitimate interested complainants in all files related to the events denounced herein, without prejudice or waiver of other rights and actions.
The complaint that initiated O.S. 46/0012400/21 of ITSS is attached in this 12-page PDF from the date of its registration, requesting prompt acknowledgment of receipt.
@miguelgallardo Dr. (PhD) Miguel Gallardo PERITO Tel. (+34) 902998352 E-mail: [email protected]
@APEDANICA Asociación APEDANICA registered with the Ministry of the Interior www.cita.es/apedanica.pdf
To whom it may concern in the Inspection of the Ministry of Labor and Ministry of Inclusion, Social Security, and Migrations
Cc: To the Prosecutor’s Office for any signs of presumed wrongdoing and the Valencia Bar Association ICAV in the complaint published at www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-abogados-precarios.pdf
https://twitter.com/APEDANICA/status/1390974617704095744
The Court of 1st Instance 4 of Gandía has provided us with the Invoicing to the company LEGAL ERASER SL with CIF B98980634 from lawyer SARA PASTOR SANESTEBAN, requested by the Prosecutor’s Office in Preliminary Hearing. Their relationship, like that of FRANCISCO JAVIER FRANCH FLETA, LUIS ABELLÁN VALLET, JOSÉ LUIS MONTESINOS CATRET and FERNANDO MARÍA CHAPA SANCHO, with the company LEGAL ERASER SL and its sole administrator JESÚS CAMPOS GINER, who is also legally responsible for CDC NEPHRO DEVICES SL, GRANATUM AGRICOLA SL, ACCUAPLUS SOLUCIONES AVANZADAS PARA EL AGUA SL, FITOAGUA SL, FITO RIEGO SL, can be seen on LinkedIn (it claims to have 4 EMPLOYEES) considering among others the link of that company at https://www.linkedin.com/company/teborramos/people/
It is quite suspicious that the company denounced here has the inspector chief of the Ministry of Labor Inspection team in the Balearic Islands, Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, as a client, who has also sued us in Gavá (Barcelona) where he seems to have his residence (despite being presently, and for years, a civil servant stationed in Palma de Mallorca). The connections between this inspector, who has been definitively convicted for 2 crimes of corruption (continued bribery and prohibited negotiation of a public official), may explain, but does not justify in any way, the capacity for the Valencia-based company LEGAL ERASER SL with its brand “TeBorramos” to have human or labor resources, whether they be lawyers in practice or not, under conditions that their competitors, among many others, those advertised on the internet like teborramos.com, as is the case with borrame.es, cyber-lex.com, reputaciononlinelegal.es, salirdeinternet.com, borrarmisdatos.es, reputationup.com, eliminalia.com, eprivacidad.es, considering that we’ve been told some have indeed been inspected and opened sanctioning proceedings, against Articles 9.3 and 14 of the CE, and as provided in ROYAL DECREE LEGISLATIVE 8/2015, of October 30, which approves the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law and the ROYAL DECREE LEGISLATIVE 5/2000, of August 4, which approves the consolidated text of the Law on Infringements and Sanctions in the Social Order and other applicable rules to the facts denounced here.
Our interest in this complaint to promote effective inspection is very legitimate since we have been falsely accused of 7 crimes in a presumably false complaint in which the chief inspector of the Inspection team of the Ministry of Labor in the Balearic Islands and resident in Gavá (Barcelona) Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes is the claimant who, in coercing the truthful informant of his firm criminal conviction, has hired the company LEGAL ERASER SL, along with its sole administrator Jesús Campos Giner and several of its lawyers, as well as in 3 civil lawsuits that evidence a perverse business model based on legally appearing judicial actions signed by those who seem to be self-employed such as the documentable case of lawyer Sara Pastor Sanesteban, who, per the claims indicated in the Court of 1st Instance 4 of Gandía, regularly bills the company LEGAL ERASER SL. No judicial harassment can utilize lawyers under precarious contracts as self-employed paid by results, at least without inspection of the entity benefiting from a business model even more socially perverse than Deliveroo. Recall that the Social Court 24 of Barcelona ruled that Deliveroo riders are false self-employed and have upheld the action taken by the Labor Inspection in 2018, demanding 1.3 million euros from this firm for unremitted social contributions. We request the same inspectorate diligence in this complaint to demand all contributions from the companies related to inspector Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, the chief inspector of the Ministry of Labor inspection team in the Balearic Islands and resident in Gavá (Barcelona), the complainant and plaintiff against us, in case there is more advice like the one already proven in the sentence or alleged use of relevant privileged information socially and labor-wise.
One thing is the independent practice of law, and another very different is the activity of LEGAL ERASER SL that employs lawyers and other collaborators in a very precarious professional situation, who couldn’t even accept or refuse other assignments without that company’s authorization, with rational indications of concerted actions with other companies controlled by their administrator Jesús Campos Giner. Legal defense deserves all the possible protection, but the ultra-censorship guaranteed to the highest bidder, even for final criminal convictions for public corruption crimes, is an illicit and immoral harassment business, violating the fundamental right to give and receive truthful information, and based on what has been documented at the request of the Prosecutor’s Office, it uses freelancers while publicly advertising that they have employees.
Of all the professional activities to which a self-employed person can dedicate themselves, especially if they are a lawyer, probably the most disgusting is paid censorship guaranteed with advertising on Google AdWords through judicial harassment compensated according to the results obtained for those hiring a company branded “TeBorramos”. The Prosecutor’s Office is already aware and has documented the censorial activity of LEGAL ERASER SL and, at least, its highly questionable relationship with lawyer Sara Pastor Sanesteban. The documentation required at the request of the Prosecutor’s Office by the Court is put at the disposal of the competent inspector who identifies themselves.
For the reasons stated, we request that this complaint is filed against the companies managed by JESÚS CAMPOS GINER, CDC NEPHRO DEVICES SL, GRANATUM AGRICOLA SL, ACCUAPLUS SOLUCIONES AVANZADAS PARA EL AGUA SL, FITOAGUA SL, FITO RIEGO SL, and especially LEGAL ERASER SL, be analyzed for effective inspection considering their relations with lawyer SARA PASTOR SANESTEBAN, as well as those of FRANCISCO JAVIER FRANCH FLETA, LUIS ABELLÁN VALLET, JOSÉ LUIS MONTESINOS CATRET AND FERNANDO MARÍA CHAPA SANCHO and any other worker, lawyer or not, judged by the ROYAL DECREE LEGISLATIVE 8/2015, of October 30, which approves the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law and the ROYAL DECREE LEGISLATIVE 5/2000, of August 4, which approves the consolidated text of the Law on Infringements and Sanctions in the Social Order and other regulations applicable to the events denounced here under the principle da mihi facta, dabo tibi ius (“give me the facts, and I will give you the law” which is exactly what here we provide and request) requesting acknowledgment of receipt and grounds for appeal against any potential rejection reasons, as it is Justice that we request upon the date of registration of this complaint in a PDF of 8 pages with attached links and references.
VERIFIABLE REFERENCES relevant for your inspection:
The company LEGAL ERASER SL with CIF B98980634 was established on 26/2/2018, as noted for litigation, and has published data at www.empresia.es/empresa/legal-eraser
C/ REINA VIOLANTE 4 BAJA – LOCAL 1, IZQUIERDA. (VALENCIA)
and advertised at its own domain www.teborramos.com
In AXESOR, there is no record of their annual accounts presentation
Its sole administrator is Jesús Campos Giner, who advertises very actively boasting many employees on LinkedIn (the inspection should verify the data published on that network) and administers according to www.empresia.es/persona/campos-giner-jesus
Judicial documents relevant with statements from the complainants here regarding the business and practices of the reported company, their worker collaborators concerning which we request inspection are SARA PASTOR SANESTEBAN, FRANCISCO JAVIER FRANCH FLETA, LUIS ABELLÁN VALLET, JOSÉ LUIS MONTESINOS CATRET and FERNANDO MARÍA CHAPA SANCHO, client inspector chief of the Labor Inspection team in the Balearic Islands and resident in Gavá (Barcelona) Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes at
www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-archivada-querella-mendaz.pdf
www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-querellantes-mendaces.pdf
http://miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-hechos-nuevos-google.pdf
http://www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-contestada.pdf
http://www.miguelgallardo.es/apedanica-contesta-teborramos.pdf
http://cita.es/contesta-demanda-funcionario-teborramos-registrada.pdf
NOTE: The complainants here are responsible for everything published on the domains miguelgallardo.es and cita.es and are also on
https://twitter.com/APEDANICA/status/1390974617704095744
@miguelgallardo Dr. (PhD) Miguel Gallardo PERITO Tel. (+34) 902998352 E-mail: [email protected]
@APEDANICA Asociación APEDANICA registered with the Ministry of the Interior www.cita.es/apedanica.pdf
TO FISCALITY which corresponds to this CRIMINAL COMPLAINT published at www.miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-querellantes-mendaces.pdf
As must be recognized by the Public Ministry, the PROVINCIAL AUDIENCE (SECOND SECTION) of VALENCIA in Appeal Procedure Autos Instruction [RAU] No. 001582/2020- PE – originating from the Preliminary Proceedings [DIP] No. 000953/2020 of the COURT OF INSTRUCTION No. 21 OF VALENCIA in the ORDER 27/2021 dated 15.1.2021, presented by magistrate PEDRO ANTONIO CASAS COBO, published on the internet
http://miguelgallardo.es/teborramos-archivada-querella-mendaz.pdf
DEFINITIVELY ARCHIVED the mendacious complaint of the company LEGAL ERASER SL and several of its collaborators in the service of the public official inspector chief of the Labor Inspection team in the Balearic Islands and resident in Gavá (Barcelona) Miguel Ángel Montero de Espinosa Solbes, convicted of two corruption crimes (continued bribery and prohibited negotiation to a public official), as the Prosecutor’s Office is also aware.
This definitively archived complaint is false under the stipulations in Article 456 of the Penal Code and others concurrent, for containing false accusations of 7 crimes (AGAINST HONOR, FALSE ACCUSATION AND COMPLAINT, AND SIMULATION OF CRIMES, REGARDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, DISCOVERY AND REVELATION OF SECRETS, and PROCESS FRAUD, in addition to labeling the defendant as an obsessive sociopath), knowing that the complainants have NOT COMMITTED ANY CRIME AGAINST HONOR, OF FALSE ACCUSATION AND COMPLAINT, AND SIMULATION OF CRIMES, RELATIVES TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, DISCOVERY AND REVELATION OF SECRETS, and PROCESS FRAUD, some being very maliciously falsified with several fallacies subsumed in the most notorious and repugnant mendacity.
Moreover, their intent is corruptly profitable due to the complainants being a commercial company and some lawyers who advertise effective censorship guaranteed, even for judicial resolutions which firmly condemn public officials for corruption crimes. Of the 7 crimes, the most mendacious, for being ridiculously absurd, is that of revealing secrets. The defendant has devoted a considerable part of their professional life, precisely, to Cryptology, and their doctoral thesis is dedicated to the issues of secrets, but the accusations of the complainants here evidence an extremely serious issue of great significance, not just penal. If LEGAL ERASER and its lawyers and clients aim to censor with complaints that impute crimes of revelation and discovery of secrets to someone who publishes true and verifiable facts derived from open-source data, the prosecutors involved who know of that mendacious accusation without acting may be accused of an offense stipulated in Article 408 of the Penal Code, or they themselves, and also anyone could be accused of all those 7 crimes (AGAINST HONOR, FALSE ACCUSATION AND COMPLAINT, AND SIMULATION OF CRIMES, REGARDING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, DISCOVERY AND REVELATION OF SECRETS, and PROCESS FRAUD, capable of labeling anyone as obsessive sociopath), with impunity.
The dealings with prosecutors by a complainant lawyer, who boasts on LinkedIn of having interned at the Valencia Prosecutor’s Office and having spent several years preparing for the Prosecutor’s body opposition exams, are not only indications of mendacity but of presumed corruption involving more public officials than the defendant client of the reported company LEGAL ERASER SL.
We, the complainants here denouncing the mendacity of that complaint and all its maliciously false accusations, adopt all the legal grounds condemning the ruling STS 1193/2010 (rapporteur Miguel Colmenero Menéndez de Luarca) under which ALFREDO SÁENZ ABAD, MIGUEL ANGEL CALAMA TEIXEIRA and RAFAEL JIMÉNEZ DE PARGA Y CABRERA were condemned, confirming, at least in the part most relevant here, the also condemning ruling previously issued by the Provincial Court of Barcelona, Third Section, on December 18, 2009, in a case followed against the same condemned and two more, for offenses of false accusation and complaint, and process fraud.
It is not permissible to recover failed credits from BANESTO, now Banco Santander, through mendacious complaints, nor can anyone be compelled to delete anything published regarding truthful information on matters of public relevance and interest through such a mendacious complaint containing 7 accusations for 7 offenses that several lawyers from the company LEGAL ERASER SL and a public official have imputed against us, and no ignorance on the substance of the matter can allow them to escape their responsibility. Should any ignorance exist on the part of the complainants herein denounced, it would be such a DELIBERATE IGNORANCE in the sense of the STS Criminal Chamber of June 9, 2015 (raporteur Cándido Conde Pumpido) concerning complaining jurists with corrupt profit intentions.
The accusation in a false complaint, as all prosecutors ought to know, is not only an aggravated slander by having been gleaned before officials who have the obligation to instruct, although that is also the case. That complaint represents the body of a prosecutable offense by its very fact of having made a very malicious use of the Administration of Justice, which is the primary legal good that any honest prosecutor ought to protect. The business of LEGAL ERASER SL appears to be based on systematic judicial harassment, which means all its complaints with profit intentions must be specially analyzed by the competent Prosecutors. This is not an isolated case; instead, it’s a querulous business marketed through Google AdWords ads, as several prosecutors already know.
Unfortunately, the defendants who now denounce here before the Prosecutor’s Office for such false inadmissible accusations do not have the resources of Pedro Olavaria Delclaux, Luis Fernando Romero García, José Ignacio Romero García, or Modesto González Mestre to file complaints as they did against ALFREDO SÁENZ ABAD, MIGUEL ÁNGEL CALAMA TEXEIRA, and RAFAEL JIMÉNEZ DE PARGA Y CABRERA, but we are firmly willing to exhaust all procedures and resources within our reach, including investigating any possible connection between the denounced parties and prosecutors, and to publish all of it, at least with the same rights of expression as in the case of lawyer Marta Flor Núñez with prosecutor Ignacio Stampa Fuente, or that of former judge Luis Pascual Estevill with condemned lawyers such as Rafael Jiménez de Parga or Joan Piqué Vidal, until exhausting the right to provide and receive truthful information, and the freedom of expression concerning the denounced here until the very last limit provided for in the GENERAL STATE PROSECUTION DOCTRINE Instruction. 3/2005, of April 7, concerning the relationships between the Prosecutor’s Office and the media. Reference: FIS-I-2005-00003 published at
http://www.cita.es/fiscales-censuradores.pdf
In this regard, we note the Chief Prosecutor of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Provincial Audience of Valencia, José Francisco Ortiz Navarro, prosecutors Yolanda Domínguez Blasco, Raquel Ibáñez Sanz, Ana Estellés Martí (in Gandía) and R. Cabrera Carballo (in Gavá), as well as everything we have already informed the State Attorney General FGE by inspector prosecutor José Hidalgo García, Chief Inspector Prosecutor Fausto José Cartagena Pastor and Deputy Prosecutor Inspector Almudena Lastra de Inés, and we ground this on the doctoral thesis of María José Ordeig Orero directed by Tomás Vives Antón and published under the title “The Crime of False Accusation and Complaint” by Marcial Pons Legal and Social Editions in 2000, that should not be missing in the personal library of any prosecutor, especially when they are involved or receiving complaints of harassing actions from lawyers and clients of LEGAL ERASER SL. They must know that if those 7 mendacious accusations go unpunished, it will be free to accuse anyone of the same crimes, including prosecutors, and to harass them as prosecutor José Grinda González seems to feel harassed due to the not so many judicial actions and complaints for sanction as presented in LEGAL ERASER SL.
Everyone who reads this complaint, whether or not a prosecutor, should bear in mind that the complainants here have never received benefits or even any paid advertising for publishing true and publicly relevant facts. However, those now denounced who have falsely complained are indeed making a profit from all their harassing legal actions, as several prosecutors are already aware. The profit motive, and positioning a censoring company through judicial harassment is an aggravating factor and civil liability that must be compensated. In other words, those who file a false complaint must indemnify, and in this case, personally, each of the complainants shall be held jointly liable, and any amount shall be insignificant given the history and business model of LEGAL ERASER, SL alongside its sole administrator, its lawyers, and a public official client whose relationship and intention should be well clarified by another presumed recidivism in their corruption.
This complaint to the Prosecutor’s Office does not imply a waiver of any other right that may correspond to the complainants here who request the prompt identification of the file and the name of the prosecutor in charge of the investigative of the mendacious falsehood of the complaint that must necessarily be known and we demand the Public Prosecutor express recognize shortly, also considering the labor-sociological complaint that is ATTACHED.