Venezuela Polìtica. All rights reserved. This content is protected by U.S. copyright laws. Total or partial reproduction is prohibited without the express permission of the author. If you want to use this content, please include a visible credit with a link to Venezuelapolitica.info, including for those who use it on their Youtube programs and any other platform.
In the murky world of major oil companies, where billion-dollar balances are the norm, a legal dispute is shaking the foundations of the giant Chevron. The Venezuelan drilling service company, Servicios Ojeda, C.A., has filed an explosive lawsuit in Texas, accusing Chevron Corporation and Chevron USA, Inc. of refusing to pay over $24 million for essential services rendered between 2016 and 2020.
As Servicios Ojeda, a family-owned business, fights to collect what is rightfully owed, the irony is palpable: Chevron, a corporation with annual profits that reach astronomical figures, appears to be using its power and the complex geopolitical situation to evade its financial obligations.
The debt: over $24 million in limbo
The lawsuit details how Servicios Ojeda performed crucial drilling work for Chevron’s joint ventures with the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (PDVSA) in the vital Orinoco Belt. These services, according to the lawsuit, were fundamental for the extraction of heavy and extra-heavy crude that fuels Chevron’s refineries, including its Pascagoula, Mississippi plant, specifically designed for this type of crude.
Despite recognizing the debt and even participating in an extensive reconciliation process at its own request, Chevron has allegedly refused to disburse the $24,096,811.97 owed, a sum that includes Value Added Tax. Servicios Ojeda claims that this tactic is part of a ruthless strategy by a “giant” looking to “finance its downstream business at the expense of family-owned businesses and service providers.”
The enormous power of Chevron against the needs of a supplier
The lawsuit paints a picture of overwhelming power disparity. While Chevron enjoys multi-billion dollar revenues and global influence, Servicios Ojeda, like many service companies, relies on the continuity of contracts for its survival. The accusation that Chevron is taking advantage of this need to avoid payment resonates with concerns about how large corporations often exercise dominance over smaller businesses.
Are sanctions a shield of commercial impunity?
A crucial point in the dispute is the issue of sanctions imposed by the United States on Venezuela. While Chevron operates under a specific OFAC license, Servicios Ojeda argues vehemently that this license does not grant the oil company “commercial impunity.” The obligation to pay for contracted services, they insist, persists despite the complex political landscape.
In fact, the lawsuit alleges that, after obtaining a new license in 2022, Chevron even pressured Servicios Ojeda to sign a new contract, implicitly suggesting that payment of outstanding invoices would be more likely if they agreed to continue providing services. This tactic, if true, raises serious questions about Chevron’s business ethics.
The hidden control: Is Petropiar a “Corporate Alter Ego” of Chevron?
One of the most intriguing allegations in the lawsuit is that Chevron exerts such significant control over its joint venture with PDVSA, Petropiar, that the latter operates as a “corporate alter ego” of the American corporation. Servicios Ojeda details how Chevron supposedly appoints executives, controls accounts receivable, and approves payments from Petropiar, arguing that “there is no real separation” between the two entities.
This assertion is key as Servicios Ojeda seeks to hold Chevron directly accountable for Petropiar’s debts, especially given the alleged insolvency of the joint venture, which reportedly owes between $840 and $880 million to other suppliers.
Justice and accountability
The lawsuit from Servicios Ojeda is not just a monetary dispute; it’s a clash between a small company seeking justice and a giant oil company accused of using its power to evade its responsibilities. The claims for compensation under Texas and Venezuelan laws, which include actual and exemplary damages, attorney’s fees, and interest, reflect the gravity of the allegations.
As thiscase proceeds through the courts, it will be crucial to observe whether Chevron will respond to these serious allegations and if it will be held accountable for the debts that, according to Servicios Ojeda, it has recognized. The lingering question is whether a corporation with Chevron’s vast influence can continue operating under a shadow of commercial impunity, taking advantage of service providers while its profits keep rising.